RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01307 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s Home of Record (HOR) be changed to San Antonio, TX. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her late husband considered San Antonio, TX his home of record. He owned property in Texas. The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider her untimely request so that his daughter may utilize military educational benefits. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to his DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, signed 17 Nov 70, his HOR is Corvallis, Oregon. According to his four remaining DD Forms 4, signed 3 Feb 75, 30 Sep 78, 13 Jun 86 and 13 Nov 92, his HOR is Roseburg, Oregon. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIP recommends denial. The DD Form 4 is the source document for HOR. The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR), Volume I, Appendix A, reads Home of Record is the place recorded as the individual’s home when commissioned, appointed, enlisted, inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty. Additionally, it states the place recorded as the individual’s home when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that recorded when commissioned, appointed, enlisted or inducted or ordered into the tour of active duty unless there is a break in service of more than one full day. Only if a break in service exceeds one full day may the member change the HOR. Any such correction must be fully justified and the home, as corrected, must be the member’s actual home upon entering the Service, and not a different place selected for the member’s convenience. The AFPC Enlisted Accessions Branch was unable to confirm that the member initialed the DD Form 4 as one was not provided. According to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, his HOR appears to be Roseburg, Oregon. The complete DPSIP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 4 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01307 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Mar 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIP, dated 1 Sep 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Oct 14.